- introspection ft. harsehaj
- Posts
- low-maintenance friendships
low-maintenance friendships
not the biggest fan 🧑🤝🧑
welcome to introspection ft. harsehaj! ⭐️ i’m harsehaj, a 19 y/o always up to something in social good x tech.
this publication is a place for me to reflect on productivity, health and tech, and drop unique opportunities in the space right to your inbox daily. if you’re new here, sign up to tune in! 💌
btw, feel free to reply with topic ideas you want me to write about for future posts.
onto today’s topic: low-maintenance friendships 🧑🤝🧑
i’m sure you’ve seen those tiktoks praising and saying “in the end, it’s you and that friend you only have to talk to once a year to still be besties.”
i call bs!
sure, low-maintenance friendships probably work for certain types of friends, like concert buddies or the specific friend that you go to a party with. 🎉
this is because you have that same, once in a while touch point. if you want to grow that friendship into something more all-encompassing and upgrade them to other parts of your life, those touch points and mutual effort put into the relationship naturally increase.
just playing catchup once a year doesn’t build on the friendship. no experiences are shared, no memories formed, and the friendship becomes like a box to check. ✅
just because a friendship isn’t “low maintenance” doesn’t mean it’s high maintenance. i think those terms are a bit strange to describe relationships anyways. we aren’t talking about the upkeep of a pool, we’re talking about actual people.
keeping a friendship’s flame burning doesn’t have to take so much effort. simply going out and doing an activity together instead of catching up over a coffee does the trick. this is part of why people find it hard to sustain friendships into adulthood: you stop experiencing life together, so incorporating those shared experiences into your separate lives is an added effort. 🫂
it’s crucial though.
effort keeps a friendship alive and energizing. the bare minimum might be able to keep it afloat, at best.
Reply